Studying COVID-19 with Air-Liquid Interface Cultures
Why Is ALI a Physiologically Relevant Model System for Viral Infection?

The human airway epithelium constitutes the first line of defense against respiratory pathogens, air pollution, and allergens. Studying how these environmental insults affect the airway tissue and developing effective treatments to combat them requires a physiologically relevant model system.
Conventional submerged culture systems do not adequately capture the complex morphological and functional characteristics of the in vivo human airway, and animal primary cell models can have limited experimental windows and lack perfect homology to human systems. Addressing these limitations, air-liquid interface (ALI) culture of human primary airway epithelial cells is being increasingly adopted as a model system for the in vivo human airway epithelium.
For the study of respiratory viruses, such as the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19, ALI cultures are advantageous because they preserve key characteristics of the in vivo airway epithelium that viruses target. Viruses evolve in parallel to their host cells and, consequently, show pronounced specificity for both host species and cell type. Infection models for a given virus must therefore be specific to and closely representative of the native cells it targets. To date, the ALI culture system has been used to study a wide range of viruses, including the novel coronavirus.
Early Studies of the Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 with ALI Culture
Zhu N et al. (2020) N Engl J Med 382(8):727–33.
Lu R et al. (2020) Lancet 395(10224): 565–74.
In order to isolate and identify a novel pathogen causing illness in China, researchers involved in the two studies above infected ALI cultures of pathogen-free human airway epithelial cells with fluid from patients showing symptoms. This human airway infection model allowed the scientists to isolate the virus that was reproducibly infecting human lung cells, sequence its genome, and investigate elements of its pathogenesis with transmission electron microscopy.
Zhu N et al. (2020) Nat Commun 11(1): 3910.
Scientists from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention infected primary human airway epithelial cells (HAECs) with SARS-CoV-2 to investigate transmission, morphogenesis, and pathogenesis of the virus. A pseudostratified epithelial layer, resembling that of the human airway and formed by expanding and differentiating HAECs in PneumaCultâ„¢-Ex Plus Medium and ±Ê²Ô±ð³Ü³¾²¹°ä³Ü±ô³Ùâ„¢-´¡³¢±õ Medium, respectively, was used to study the virus’ replication efficacy and the cytopathic and morphological changes in ciliated and secretory cells.
- See recent news related to these publications >
Lukassen S et al. (2020) EMBO J Apr 4. Epub ahead of print, DOI: 10.15252/embj.20105114.
Scientists in Germany used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to probe which cells in the lungs had the highest expression of transmembrane receptors for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Although they used primary healthy lung tissue samples for the larger airways, this is impractical for the very small subsegmental bronchial branches, where sample sizes are small. To increase the number of cells for analysis, these scientists grew cells from the lung’s smallest airways into ALI cultures in ±Ê²Ô±ð³Ü³¾²¹°ä³Ü±ô³Ùâ„¢-´¡³¢±õ Medium.
Sungnak et al. (2020) Nat Med 26: 681–87.
In this study, an international group of researchers used scRNAseq and ALI cultures of nasal epithelial cells grown in ±Ê²Ô±ð³Ü³¾²¹°ä³Ü±ô³Ùâ„¢-´¡³¢±õ Medium to show that differentiating cells at the ALI, particularly secretory and ciliated cells, express progressively more ACE2. They note the value of the ALI culture system as a biologically relevant in vitro model for SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis.
Webinar: Studying Respiratory Viruses with ALI Cultures
ALI as a Model System to Study Viruses, Including SARS-CoV-2

ALI culture of primary human airway cells is uniquely suited as a model for in vitro infection studies. This is due to the ability of ALI cultures to faithfully recapitulate key characteristics of the in vivo airway. For example, ALI cultures exhibit relevant proportions of airway cell types, appropriate cellular polarization and junctional properties, dynamic physiologic processes such as mucus secretion and coordinated ciliary beating, and physiological expression and subcellular localization of characteristic proteins bearing species-specific sequences. Depending on the infection mechanism of the virus under study, each one of these properties can be a crucial feature of the model system.
The ability of ALI cultures to model the key features of the in vivo airway highlights the greater physiological relevance of this system over other conventional cell culture models. Human airway ALI cultures allow for efficient infection of cultured cells and have been used to model various mechanisms of viral pathogenesis and human disease (see publication highlights below). This model provides a platform for researchers to study how specific viral characteristics influence pathogenesis during infection. This includes investigating protein interactions during intracellular replication,1 factors impacting viral entry into cells,2 and infection kinetics.3 The ALI infection model has also been used to interrogate the mechanisms of tissue damage and cell death4 as well as aspects of host response, such as interferon response to infection.5 The applications of ALI cultures, which can be generated from pediatric6 and adult human cells, are wide ranging. ALI cultures have been co-infected with bacteria and viruses, and cultures generated from zoonotic vectors (e.g. pig) have also been studied in the context of human disease dynamics.7 The utility of ALI cultures for studying viral infection represents a valuable tool for developing antiviral therapeutic approaches;5 viral neutralization by monoclonal antibodies has also been tested in this model.8
Coronaviruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illnesses ranging from the common cold to severe respiratory diseases, including COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The cell entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 has recently been confirmed by independent research groups to be angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)—the same entry receptor for the SARS-CoV virus that caused the 2003 SARS outbreak9,10. Human large and small airway cultures grown at the ALI show abundant ACE2 expression (Figure 1) and provide a physiologically relevant model for investigating ACE2 as a target for antiviral intervention against COVID-19.

Figure 1. Presence of ACE2 in HBECs Cultured in ±Ê²Ô±ð³Ü³¾²¹°ä³Ü±ô³Ùâ„¢-´¡³¢±õ Medium and HSAECs Cultured in ±Ê²Ô±ð³Ü³¾²¹°ä³Ü±ô³Ùâ„¢-´¡³¢±õ-S Medium
Confocal images of whole mount immunostained ALI cultures of (A) human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) cultured in ±Ê²Ô±ð³Ü³¾²¹°ä³Ü±ô³Ùâ„¢-´¡³¢±õ Medium and (B) human small airway epithelial cells (HSAECs) cultured in ±Ê²Ô±ð³Ü³¾²¹°ä³Ü±ô³Ùâ„¢-´¡³¢±õ-S Medium, at P2. The ALI cultures were fixed and stained with antibodies for ciliated cells (AC-tubulin; green), SARS-CoV-2 receptor (ACE2; magenta), and tight junctions (ZO1; red). The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). ACE2 was detected in both (A) large and (B) small airway culture systems during early passages (≤P6, HBECs; ≤P4, HSAECs). Both HBECs and HSAECs were expanded in PneumaCultâ„¢-Ex Plus Medium prior to differentiation at the ALI.
Publication Highlights
Coronavirus (CoVs)
- Menachery VD et al. (2020) J Virol 94(5): e01774–19.
- Widagdo W et al. (2019) J Virol 93(16): e00107–19.
- Shirato K et al. (2018) Virology 517: 9–15.
Parvovirus (HBoV1)
- Wang K et al. (2020) J Virol 94(2): e01444–19.
- Deng et al. (2017) J Virol 91(24):e01533–17.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
- Wethington D et al. (2019) J R Soc Interface. 16(160):20190389.
- Anderson CS et al. (2019) Pediatr Res doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0677-0.
- Cortjens B et al. (2017) J Virol 91(10): e02357–16.
Influenza
- Richard M et al. (2020) Nat Commun 7;11(1):766.
- Chen AJ et al. (2019) J Virol 16(1):44.
- Meng F et al. (2019) Infect Immun 87(8): e00350–19.
Rhinovirus
- Wu Q et al. (2018) Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 314(3): L514–L527.
- Griggs TF et al. (2017) Respir Res 18(1): 84.
- Warner SM et al. (2019) Respir Res 20(1):150.
Why Is ALI Culture Physiologically Relevant?
Primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) cultured at the ALI undergo extensive mucociliary differentiation that recapitulates what is observed in vivo. As a result, ALI culture of HBECs is increasingly being recognized as the most physiologically relevant in vitro model system for respiratory research. While the use of immortalized cell lines and primary cells from animals is common, data generated using these models are not directly applicable to the human system.11 Submerged culture of primary HBECs is possible; however, cells in this system fail to undergo mucociliary differentiation and thus do not accurately represent the in vivo airway.
The physiological relevance of the ALI culture system is supported by phenotypical and histological evidence. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining show that HBECs cultured at the ALI are (Figure 2A and 2C) pseudostratified in morphology and make up a heterogeneous cell population that includes ciliated and mucus-secreting (PAS-positive) cells, similar to the in vivo bronchial epithelium (Figure 2B and 2D). An important function of the tracheobronchial epithelium in vivo is to act as a protective barrier against inhaled insults. The same epithelial barrier function has been confirmed in ALI cultures by the expression of tight junction proteins and the development of high transepithelial electrical resistance.12 The suitability of ALI cultures for modeling the airway has been further confirmed through transcriptome analyses13 and a wide range of experiments demonstrating physiological responses to insults such as toxicants and pathogens.14-16 Importantly, ALI cultures of primary cells from donors with respiratory disease (e.g. asthma, cystic fibrosis, COPD) recapitulate in vivo disease characteristics, forming robust in vitro models of these conditions.17-18

Figure 2. Primary Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells Cultured at the Air-Liquid Interface Recapitulate the In Vivo Bronchial Epithelium
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining reveals that cells differentiated at the air-liquid interface in ±Ê²Ô±ð³Ü³¾²¹°ä³Ü±ô³Ùâ„¢-´¡³¢±õ (A and C) form a pseudostratified epithelium that is representative of the in vivo bronchial epithelium (B and D). Data in (A) and (C) generated by Samuel Wadsworth.
Webinar: In Vitro Human Airway Modeling Using Primary Airway Epithelial Cells
How Are Cells Grown at the ALI?
The defining feature of ALI culture is that the basal surface of the cells is in contact with liquid culture medium, whereas the apical surface is exposed to air. A common approach is to seed cells onto the permeable membrane of a cell culture insert, which is initially supplied with culture medium to both the apical and basal compartments (Figure 3A). Once confluence is reached, the cells are subjected to ‘air-lift’, where the medium is supplied only to the basal chamber (Figure 3B). This configuration mimics the conditions found in the human airway and drives differentiation towards a mucociliary phenotype.

Figure 3. Air-Liquid Interface Culture
Schematic of submerged (A) and air-liquid interface (B) culture of primary human bronchial epithelial cells grown using porous culture inserts.
Products for Pulmonary Research
Recombinant Spike, Nucleocapsid, and Human ACE2 Protein
Products for Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Nucleoprotein and Spike Protein
Explore more tools, products and support for COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 research.
Featured Content and Resources
Respiratory System Overview
Get a free wallchart providing an organizational and functional overview of the respiratory system.
Optimizing In Vitro Lung Models
Dr. Rachael Rayner compares the effects of various expansion and differentiation media on primary airway cells cultured at the ALI.
References
- Wang K et al. (2020) J Virol 94(2): e01444–19.
- Griggs TF et al. (2017) Respir Res 18(1): 84.
- Wethington D et al. (2019) J R Soc Interface. 16(160):20190389.
- Deng et al. (2017) J Virol 91(24):e01533–17.
- Chen AJ et al. (2019) J Virol 91(24)
- Anderson CS et al. (2019) Pediatr Res Nov 14.
- Meng F et al. (2019) Infect Immun 87(8): e00350–19.
- Cortjens B et al. (2017) J Virol 91(10): e02357–16.
- Zhou et al. (2020) Nature 579 (7798): 270-273.
- Hoffmann et al. (2020) Cell March 4.
- Bérubé K et al. (2010) Toxicology 278(3): 311-318
- Prytherch Z et al. (2011) Macromol Biosci 11(11): 1467-1477
- Dvorak A et al. (2011) Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 44(4): 465-473
- Thaikoottathil JV et al. (2009) Eur Respir J 33(4): 835-843
- Krunkosky TM et al. (2007) Microb Pathog 42(2-3): 98-103
- Palermo LM et al. (2009) J Virol 83(13): 6900-6908
- Ostrowski LE et al. (2012) Lung 190(5): 563-571
- Comer D et al. (2013) Eur Respir J doi: 10.1183/09031936.00063112
- Yan et al. (2017) Hum Gene Ther. Aug;28(8):612-625.
- Tata et al.(2013) Nature. Nov 14;503(7475):218-23.
- Dale et al. (2019) Nov 23;2019:3010656.
- Engler et al.(2019) Methods Protoc. Oct 1;2(4). pii: E79.